Ya I've got Pacer access. I occasionally trade sto
Post# of 30066
Posted On: 02/25/2015 5:26:50 PM
.jpg)
Ya I've got Pacer access. I occasionally trade stocks in bankruptcy proceedings, so it's a must.
The docs filed on 2/23 were a Response to Order to Show Cause and a notice of appearance. I want you all to know, that viewing these docs cost me a whole $1.10 and I will accept reimbursement for my report in the form of "Thanks for nothing" and "cool story bro, thanks"
from the summary of RttOtSC:
Some history to this is that when Reginicin started arbitration they wammied Lonza with a 93 page "you done f'd up" document. Lonza didn't respond to everything, they basically said, dude, we don't even know what you're saying, you gotta be more specific, and which ones of our subsidiaries are you talking about. This led to an even longer wammy pleading by reginicin, and Lonza is saying again, "dude, we don't know what you're saying." The judge didn't necessarily agree with Lonza's confusion initially, but in anycase ordered reginicin to come back and be more specific and concise. Here again, Reginicin is saying sorry judge, but we had to do that based on the history, and we'd be happy re-write/re-amend the complaints to satisfy you. Please note that multiple times on these most up-to-date records, Reginicins claims against Lonza that are being dropped as a consequence of us grabbing Lonza ARE still being dropped, aka our deal with Lonza or any more complicated deal where claims are still dropped is still happening.
In addition, please note, this type of legal balogna is great for two parties who want to get muddied in arbitration on purpose so they can keep options open and not spend too much money because they don't actually have to spend much time in the court room or do anything of significance until these. Multiple times proceedings have been delayed with consent of both parties if you look at the history for this and that reason.
TL;DR this document is not important and proves deal is still happening.
the notice of appearance is just a lawyer introducing himself to the court on someone's behalf. nothing new.
The docs filed on 2/23 were a Response to Order to Show Cause and a notice of appearance. I want you all to know, that viewing these docs cost me a whole $1.10 and I will accept reimbursement for my report in the form of "Thanks for nothing" and "cool story bro, thanks"
from the summary of RttOtSC:
Some history to this is that when Reginicin started arbitration they wammied Lonza with a 93 page "you done f'd up" document. Lonza didn't respond to everything, they basically said, dude, we don't even know what you're saying, you gotta be more specific, and which ones of our subsidiaries are you talking about. This led to an even longer wammy pleading by reginicin, and Lonza is saying again, "dude, we don't know what you're saying." The judge didn't necessarily agree with Lonza's confusion initially, but in anycase ordered reginicin to come back and be more specific and concise. Here again, Reginicin is saying sorry judge, but we had to do that based on the history, and we'd be happy re-write/re-amend the complaints to satisfy you. Please note that multiple times on these most up-to-date records, Reginicins claims against Lonza that are being dropped as a consequence of us grabbing Lonza ARE still being dropped, aka our deal with Lonza or any more complicated deal where claims are still dropped is still happening.
In addition, please note, this type of legal balogna is great for two parties who want to get muddied in arbitration on purpose so they can keep options open and not spend too much money because they don't actually have to spend much time in the court room or do anything of significance until these. Multiple times proceedings have been delayed with consent of both parties if you look at the history for this and that reason.
TL;DR this document is not important and proves deal is still happening.
the notice of appearance is just a lawyer introducing himself to the court on someone's behalf. nothing new.
(0)
(0)