Huh. I don't know if I mentioned it but my dd incl
Post# of 4205
Posted On: 02/15/2015 4:44:09 PM
Huh. I don't know if I mentioned it but my dd included reading posts by David Foley and ir that said the np1 would be out by xmas 2013, on several occasions. He also repeatedly said it usually takes 12-18 months normally for something on that scale to occur, but he was doing it in only6
Do you recall that dd?
How about the dd from the 2013 shm where they said things were going so well and moving so fast, that with audits soon to follow, if their planned execution continued on schedule the stock could uplist soon and pps could be a dollar by 2014.
Did your dd onclude reading about how an auditor had been retained, in October 2013, and audits were expected soon?
Did your dd include ntek saying revenue from nanoflix was great, content was being made, and revenues from sales were 3 million dollars for quarter ending October 2013 and 5 million for December and March?
The truth is, nanoflix has nothing to do with ntek, and any "revenues" were strictly fromsales of stock, and nothing, else. In spite of ntek lying and saying otherwise!
If your dd didn't include those whopper lies from ntek then you're the one lying.
So the question is, if the company is lying whenever they talk, just how good can your dd be.
And that's on them. Period. But then, I repeat Myself. Again.
Things might be changing now, but you can't pretend they didn't lie.
Ok, well, you can and do. And you do pretend along with some, of your buddies. But then your proclivity to play ostrich, and your stockholm syndrome has already been noted. Along with your tendency to pretend execution and products, or lack thereof, does not dictate pps, and telling the truth about nteks lack of execution does: aka "bashing", according to your self serving, self published, "bashers handbook".
I will say this, I admire your willingness to attempt to address substance instead of just picking some irrelevant thing like some smart people do on ihub, both pumpers and bashers. They both seem to be a paid lot over there given both sides post endlessly and tirelessly.
Do you recall that dd?
How about the dd from the 2013 shm where they said things were going so well and moving so fast, that with audits soon to follow, if their planned execution continued on schedule the stock could uplist soon and pps could be a dollar by 2014.
Did your dd onclude reading about how an auditor had been retained, in October 2013, and audits were expected soon?
Did your dd include ntek saying revenue from nanoflix was great, content was being made, and revenues from sales were 3 million dollars for quarter ending October 2013 and 5 million for December and March?
The truth is, nanoflix has nothing to do with ntek, and any "revenues" were strictly fromsales of stock, and nothing, else. In spite of ntek lying and saying otherwise!
If your dd didn't include those whopper lies from ntek then you're the one lying.
So the question is, if the company is lying whenever they talk, just how good can your dd be.
And that's on them. Period. But then, I repeat Myself. Again.
Things might be changing now, but you can't pretend they didn't lie.
Ok, well, you can and do. And you do pretend along with some, of your buddies. But then your proclivity to play ostrich, and your stockholm syndrome has already been noted. Along with your tendency to pretend execution and products, or lack thereof, does not dictate pps, and telling the truth about nteks lack of execution does: aka "bashing", according to your self serving, self published, "bashers handbook".
I will say this, I admire your willingness to attempt to address substance instead of just picking some irrelevant thing like some smart people do on ihub, both pumpers and bashers. They both seem to be a paid lot over there given both sides post endlessly and tirelessly.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼