tsk tsk ... resorting to personal attacks .. ;

tsk tsk ...

resorting to personal attacks ..

fascinating what *normally* gets trotted out by rote by the 'da *crew* >> there
goes *poof* .. when needed to be sourced .. sort of like the *crews'* lack of
posts about the national co. .. which they clearly can't *source* because it
removes their use of monosyllabic *posts* (aka noise done to bury)

oh yeah LR >> 2 points

i don't believe *you* .. and 50 P2O investors did read DD over 2 weeks ago
re: EcoNav and her >> *connections* >> so to speak

and if you feel inclined to *worry* about a James T. >> you go for it

it's irrelevant to what i posted re: 1995/2002 and 2004 ..

4kids




loanranger Member Level Monday, 01/26/15 08:45:32 AM
Re: fourkids_9pets post# 278140
Post # of 278144

I don't believe you . If "it's very easily sourced" then source it. Link it. Or quote it.....it's certainly "on topic".

Tell me how an LLC that wasn't formed until January of 2014 can be referred to at these points in time:
"1995 >>

Quote:became partners in .. with the acquisition (of)



2002 >> ..

Quote:was established in 2002 as the manufacturing holdings (of)



2004 >> ..

Quote:was founded in 2004 as the ..."


Here are the 4 links from my post. Tel me where I can find this: " 2004) comes directly from one of the links provided via your post ".
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1736...%3Aprimary

https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1436...e_map-name

http://www.eventbrite.com/e/rochester-ny-clea...0724255537

http://appext20.dos.ny.gov/corp_public/CORPSE...lts_page=0


Wherever this is from it has successfully evaded Google:
"EcoNavigation is a processor of waste into revenue streams. The "Eco" is the ecological responsibility we aspire to and the "Navigation" is the path with which we guide those previously landfilled products into new forms for re-use."
It sounds familiar but I can't find it.



I expect that people holding PTOI shares who don't know the answers to those questions and don't know who the mythical national engineering firm is may look forward to your response as much as I do.
By the way, it amazes me that a national firm that employs "over 1,000 engineers" needs to have its identity protected from a couple of (probably fabricated) quacks making phone calls.



Finally, as you know my inadequate research has failed to identify James T and I have sought your assistance with that. Do you not know anything about him or will you be keeping that to yourself as well?