Having a long-term outlook, a RS can be viewed as

Having a long-term outlook, a RS can be viewed as just a step needed to get to Nasdaq. What no one mentions here when posting concerns over a RS is that with increased demand from institutional investors and particularly once revenues start rolling in from assets brought to market, there exists a real possibility of forward splits to lessen the impact to long shareholders from any RS done to uplist.

So, unless one is intending to unload their shares, a RS might not have a long-term impact at all.

If an uplist can be done without a RS, then the concern over share dilution will likely be minimized by a stock buyback. Revenue potential far exceeds the current expected costs of bringing the assets to market. What will the company do with that extra cash? Expand into additional assets to develop, of course, but I would also expect a portion to be directed to share repurchases, reversing the number of shares issued during the pre-revenue period of growth.

I see both of these as distinct possibilities, and as a long-term investor, the RS or dilution many are concerned with are significantly lower concerns for me. It allows me to focus on the story, and not get my stomach in knots over every detail along the way. Your mileage may vary, but I am very glad to be in this investment at this stage of their development.