Loco, I see it from your point of view. But there'
Post# of 30066
Posted On: 01/03/2015 11:46:35 AM
Re: Loco motion #14258
Loco, I see it from your point of view. But there's always going to be a point of view that counters another.
If GC plans to explain the results, some will view it as learning from the past and ensuring shareholders better understand the data presented, while some might fear the data is bad if it needs explanation. If GC wasn't going to explain the results, some could fear a repeat of the market response to the July data.
If a board member or officer buys shares, some view it as a good sign, while some complain that they should have bought more, or point out that other board members aren't buying shares.
If the company announces a new acquisition of a promising asset, some will look at the value added and the revenue potential when brought to market, while others will be complaining about the potential dilution needed to pay for the asset.
Given the choice, I choose to focus on the positive. That doesn't mean I ignore the other aspects. But if the negative viewpoint becomes my main focus, then I've clearly lost confidence in my investment and should sell and move on, or lower my risk by reducing my holdings. Concerns are one thing, but when an investor uses the word "fear", it's clearly past the point of concern, and action should be taken instead of simply posting on a message board. My opinion, which is worth what you paid for it. LOL
Having a Plan B in place in case Plan A doesn't work out is always a good strategy, and can help to eliminate or reduce fear of the unknown in an investment. I suppose that's one reason I don't fear my investment here, while some interpret it as sticking my head in the sand.
If GC plans to explain the results, some will view it as learning from the past and ensuring shareholders better understand the data presented, while some might fear the data is bad if it needs explanation. If GC wasn't going to explain the results, some could fear a repeat of the market response to the July data.
If a board member or officer buys shares, some view it as a good sign, while some complain that they should have bought more, or point out that other board members aren't buying shares.
If the company announces a new acquisition of a promising asset, some will look at the value added and the revenue potential when brought to market, while others will be complaining about the potential dilution needed to pay for the asset.
Given the choice, I choose to focus on the positive. That doesn't mean I ignore the other aspects. But if the negative viewpoint becomes my main focus, then I've clearly lost confidence in my investment and should sell and move on, or lower my risk by reducing my holdings. Concerns are one thing, but when an investor uses the word "fear", it's clearly past the point of concern, and action should be taken instead of simply posting on a message board. My opinion, which is worth what you paid for it. LOL
Having a Plan B in place in case Plan A doesn't work out is always a good strategy, and can help to eliminate or reduce fear of the unknown in an investment. I suppose that's one reason I don't fear my investment here, while some interpret it as sticking my head in the sand.
(0)
(0)