I have never, ever stated that my investment makes

I have never, ever stated that my investment makes my opinion any more or less important than any other investor. Feel free to show us where I've posted that.

It's not about being biased. It's about being confident in my decision to invest heavily in Amarantus. I have seen Dave post every random negative thought that crosses his mind, and then try to make it a major concern for shareholders. When I fail to show the same level of concern he has, I'm accused of being insulated because I own too many shares, or have too much invested, and therefore stick my head in the sand rather than have an intelligent discussion. That analysis is not only pathetically moronic, but dead wrong. Why I can remain calm when others (particularly Dave) are losing sleep worrying over what might happen with their investment has nothing to do with the amount I've invested. Seriously.

What Dave and yourself fail to understand is that I'm in a position to take a lot more risk here than most. In my mind I've already considered the possibility this investment won't work out, and have a fallback plan in case it doesn't. It's sad that open-minded intellectuals such as you and Dave can't understand that, probably because you've never experienced it. So that means I must be biased, not objective, and narrow minded, because my perception of risk and loss differs from yours, correct?

Since neither of you have the amount invested I have invested, I doubt you're qualified to make any judgement on my motives or my confidence here. So I'll kindly ask you to STFU about things you know nothing about, before you make yourselves look even more like morons with these continued claims.