Also post #11957 has to be reposted along with #11
Post# of 1084
Posted On: 10/30/2014 11:51:42 AM
Also post #11957 has to be reposted along with #11815. Thanks for the info TB, great DD on your part. Keep up the good work TB, great post.
TMMI Believer Tuesday, 10/21/14 02:57:14 PM
Re: 4retire post# 11955
Post # 11957
Wow it just gets more snake charming with all these continuous recycled stories.
It is getting old and tired.
For all of those who are really interested in what is happening even more behind the scenes is below.
You don't need to be a insider like you have accused me of or have a phone link to the company or lawyers which i don't !! as this is all for public viewing.
You can call and find out from the patent office Fracked up at the number i gave the board.You are right it does not say injunction.!
TMMI is challenging the ownership of the patent 8639053. Hmm injunction vs rightful ownership.
Petition for interparties review of patent
I think the key wording form the one who wrote the paper was Prior Art.Look at this mans CV who has dedicated his life to video compression.
Man he is so highly respected he was just involved and provided opinions in one of the largest tech suits which just took place.Google his name and you will see which one it was Hmmm just a mom and pop type guy who knows nothing of what he is talking about
Sound familiar.
If you want here are the steps to read thanks to the live voice ( Cathy)at the patent office.Its the only way to get information
go to www.uspto.gov
On the left side go down to where it says PTAB.Click on it
Click on the right side where it says Trials
Then click on Patent review process
Then click direct link under PRPS
Click search for proceedings
Put in patent 8639053
Enjoy read.
Fracked this was a phone call away like you said call patent office.
Spin away your story on this .I am sure this is all just a waste of all us share holders money ?
TB
TMMI Believer Tuesday, 10/21/14 02:57:14 PM
Re: 4retire post# 11955
Post # 11957
Wow it just gets more snake charming with all these continuous recycled stories.
It is getting old and tired.
For all of those who are really interested in what is happening even more behind the scenes is below.
You don't need to be a insider like you have accused me of or have a phone link to the company or lawyers which i don't !! as this is all for public viewing.
You can call and find out from the patent office Fracked up at the number i gave the board.You are right it does not say injunction.!
TMMI is challenging the ownership of the patent 8639053. Hmm injunction vs rightful ownership.
Petition for interparties review of patent
I think the key wording form the one who wrote the paper was Prior Art.Look at this mans CV who has dedicated his life to video compression.
Man he is so highly respected he was just involved and provided opinions in one of the largest tech suits which just took place.Google his name and you will see which one it was Hmmm just a mom and pop type guy who knows nothing of what he is talking about
Sound familiar.
If you want here are the steps to read thanks to the live voice ( Cathy)at the patent office.Its the only way to get information
go to www.uspto.gov
On the left side go down to where it says PTAB.Click on it
Click on the right side where it says Trials
Then click on Patent review process
Then click direct link under PRPS
Click search for proceedings
Put in patent 8639053
Enjoy read.
Fracked this was a phone call away like you said call patent office.
Spin away your story on this .I am sure this is all just a waste of all us share holders money ?
TB
(0)
(0)