One of your associates has previously said on anot
Post# of 101
Posted On: 10/22/2014 12:55:52 PM
Quote:
One of your associates has previously said on another forum that your company has not contracted to perform work for Xun. Another poster asked this question, and it wasn't answered. Since you showed up on my thread, care to answer it now?
If memory serves correctly, it has been stated repeatedly that CMR has been contracted to offer promotional ("pumping" ) services and the denial by my associate relates to that. I will have to confirm this, however.
Moreover, it is evident by the lack of so-called "promotions" bearing the Xun Energy name, that there has been no promoting campaign whatsoever since the date noted on the contract between Xun and CMR.
Quote:
Why is there an invoice dated may20th, for $365,000, and why is the debt part of the court case?
The public documents made available through the court are quite specific about the role of CMR in this. Including, but not limited to the services CMR will be providing the company and the costs associated with these services.
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/Pub...146015986S
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼