Two points. First, any legitimate investor who ac
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 10/18/2014 11:13:44 PM
Re: nmbr1stckpckr #698
Two points. First, any legitimate investor who actually reads Yahoo knows immediately that it is worthless garbage. The creeps overdid it. "Banal", "obscene", "criminal", "libelous", "scum", "slime", "psychotic" etc. etc. pretty much describes many of the Yahoo posters. I simply never look at it anymore and don't think any honest investor with integrity would do so other than a saint dedicated to the salvation of an exciting company such as NanoLogix. I appreciate anyone's efforts to resist the postings there but the reality is that Yahoo is so obviously stupid "basher" slime that no real savvy investor would take it for anything but the crap it is.
As to IHub I originally had high hopes that it would be a site on which we could communicate honestly and fairly about issues relating to the company's needs, potential and development. But it became clear that some of the more rotten and vindictive Yahoo posters adopted new post names and carried their garbage and attack mentality over to IHub. The IHub Admin increasingly allowed this to go on and expand. No matter what the bashers posted they could get away with it. But if anyone tried to call them on it the responses were "dinged" as "off topic" or a "personal attack". So creepy people like "Leroy" and an identifiable group of malicious posters were allowed by IHub Admin to take over the NNLX comments because they were given free rein and anyone resisting them was engaged in "personal attacks". This reached the height of absurdity when the Moderators appointed by IHub Admin were clearly bashers and at least one of them was not even an investor.
The bottom line is that you have to ask what we could expect from IHub, whose founder pled guilty in Federal Court to using the site he created to manipulate share prices and was sentenced to multiple years in prison for his dishonesty. I communicated this sentiment to IHub Admin and (surprise) they don't want me posting on their site. I figure any attempt to "deodorize" their "stench" is not appreciated. In any event, I am traveling at the moment and will try to suggest some substantive stuff next week. Keep up the good fight, and Ray L., try to not be such a "glass half empty" guy.
As to IHub I originally had high hopes that it would be a site on which we could communicate honestly and fairly about issues relating to the company's needs, potential and development. But it became clear that some of the more rotten and vindictive Yahoo posters adopted new post names and carried their garbage and attack mentality over to IHub. The IHub Admin increasingly allowed this to go on and expand. No matter what the bashers posted they could get away with it. But if anyone tried to call them on it the responses were "dinged" as "off topic" or a "personal attack". So creepy people like "Leroy" and an identifiable group of malicious posters were allowed by IHub Admin to take over the NNLX comments because they were given free rein and anyone resisting them was engaged in "personal attacks". This reached the height of absurdity when the Moderators appointed by IHub Admin were clearly bashers and at least one of them was not even an investor.
The bottom line is that you have to ask what we could expect from IHub, whose founder pled guilty in Federal Court to using the site he created to manipulate share prices and was sentenced to multiple years in prison for his dishonesty. I communicated this sentiment to IHub Admin and (surprise) they don't want me posting on their site. I figure any attempt to "deodorize" their "stench" is not appreciated. In any event, I am traveling at the moment and will try to suggest some substantive stuff next week. Keep up the good fight, and Ray L., try to not be such a "glass half empty" guy.
(0)
(0)