Someone told me watsonhelper (who is a phony, but

Quote:

---

Someone told me watsonhelper (who is a phony, but a smart one) posted on Yahoo yesterday that Gerald was still in intense negotiations with our LymPro JV partner.

---

Someone told you wrong. watsonhelper hasn't posted on Yahoo since Sept. 4.
watsonhelper

There is some copycat posting under watsonhepler, but that person hasn't posted since Sept. 9.
watsonhepler

Personally, I don't think watsonhelper is a phony, but an industry insider who passes along thoughts on how he sees things unfolding. I would suggest his track record is at least as good as any of the predictions made on this or any other board, so there are many "phonies" making claims. I think he brings an industry perspective that helps us learn about the challenges a small company like Amarantus face, but no one should have ANY expectations based on what watsonhelper posts. Watson reminds us of this in many of his posts. So how is that phony?

In previous investments, I've seen shareholders take essentially 2 stances towards someone who posts as watson posts. If the posted opinions don't come to pass, they are labeled as a phony. If they do come to pass, they are labeled an insider and shareholders get pissed off that someone is spreading these tips and start contacting the company or possible the SEC to reel in the leak. There's no way for a poster like watson to win, whether they are accurate in their predictions or not.

It would be good if we all simply take watson's posts for what they are.... informed possibilities of what may be happening behind the scenes . They are no more phony than many of the speculations posted here.
.