Many have already voted, including myself. I'm not
Post# of 30066
Posted On: 09/08/2014 2:51:32 PM
Re: Daveludlow #5780
Many have already voted, including myself. I'm not concerned about the AS increase, as I believe it is primarily to support a spinoff and to leave both companies with adequate funding and acquisition capabilities as was discussed.
Yes, I thought your Copenhagen concerns were foolish, because you nearly sailed off the edge of the flat Earth in your suggestions that Gerald had misled us, not to mention the complete freak out by everyone on every board over the 80% data from a single biomarker, contributing to the share price tanking. Perhaps the company could have done a better job preparing us for the data that was geared toward the researchers, and it appears Gerald has learned from that mistake based on his recent blog posts.
So I ask you, did you get into this investment with delusions of becoming rich quickly, or did your DD indicate investing in a pre-revenue development-stage biotech company was a wild ride, with many obstacles and delays to be expected, and it might be years until you achieved your "rich" investment returns? If you believe we have been misled by management over expectations, then perhaps it's time to stop listening to management.
All the discussion in the world, all the sleepless nights, all the "concerns" over what might or might not happen isn't going to change how this story unfolds, because it's not in our hands. The only thing in our hands is the decision to buy, sell or hold. I certainly don't feel qualified to suggest that the company delay the vote, or close their Geneva office, or delay the Eltoprazine trials because I'm not happy with the current share price. Seriously, that would make me look pretty stupid, so I don't bother to announce it on a public message board, even if I ever had such a thought (which I have not).
Have you ever stopped for a moment to consider that voicing every concern that pops into your head on a public message board might be one reason contributing to the current share price because it instills uncertainty into those who might otherwise be buying shares? You attack the flippers for doing this, but in my view many of your own "concerned shareholder" posts could easily have the same effect on shareholder sentiment.
Yes, I thought your Copenhagen concerns were foolish, because you nearly sailed off the edge of the flat Earth in your suggestions that Gerald had misled us, not to mention the complete freak out by everyone on every board over the 80% data from a single biomarker, contributing to the share price tanking. Perhaps the company could have done a better job preparing us for the data that was geared toward the researchers, and it appears Gerald has learned from that mistake based on his recent blog posts.
So I ask you, did you get into this investment with delusions of becoming rich quickly, or did your DD indicate investing in a pre-revenue development-stage biotech company was a wild ride, with many obstacles and delays to be expected, and it might be years until you achieved your "rich" investment returns? If you believe we have been misled by management over expectations, then perhaps it's time to stop listening to management.
All the discussion in the world, all the sleepless nights, all the "concerns" over what might or might not happen isn't going to change how this story unfolds, because it's not in our hands. The only thing in our hands is the decision to buy, sell or hold. I certainly don't feel qualified to suggest that the company delay the vote, or close their Geneva office, or delay the Eltoprazine trials because I'm not happy with the current share price. Seriously, that would make me look pretty stupid, so I don't bother to announce it on a public message board, even if I ever had such a thought (which I have not).
Have you ever stopped for a moment to consider that voicing every concern that pops into your head on a public message board might be one reason contributing to the current share price because it instills uncertainty into those who might otherwise be buying shares? You attack the flippers for doing this, but in my view many of your own "concerned shareholder" posts could easily have the same effect on shareholder sentiment.
(0)
(0)