Dave, in all fairness, many on Yahoo have said the

Dave, in all fairness, many on Yahoo have said the same about you. Now, while we know you well enough to realize those posters are wrong about you, you might also be wrong in your claims about Watson. Consider that.

Whoever Watson is, or whatever his motives, it does appear he has industry-specific knowledge, and I feel I can learn something from his posts. Only fools will buy or sell based on what he posts, but as someone pointed out earlier today, he was one of the first posters to make the claim that Gerald was setting things up to go it alone with LymPro if the big pharmas tried to take advantage of our small size and lack of capital. Many mocked him at the time, but now it clearly indicates he understands the industry. It wasn't just a wild claim like some make. He backed it up with specific reasons that were industry specific. Perhaps his motives aren't as devious as you believe.

In the end, does it really matter? One can choose to read his input, or ignore it. I continue to read the quack analyst-wannabe's posts only for their entertainment value.