That's fine with me. At the end of the day, I'm pr
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 09/03/2014 3:25:34 PM
Re: Machiavelli10 #226
That's fine with me. At the end of the day, I'm pretty sure my wife and family know who I am and that's really all I'm concerned with. Carry on with your assumptions.
Not exactly sure what I could assist the company with other than encouraging them to be transparent so that they can encourage investment from the investors of the world. In a nut shell, that's pretty much how this whole thing works. You produce a product, you tell people about it, you offer transparency, and you gain investments and exposure.
I'm not sure exactly in "what way" you've concluded I've acted. Care to explain? Far as I know, I've mentioned the subject matter of transparency which is the most basic foundation to investing. Without transparency, you can't get a home loan, a car loan, a school loan, a personal loan, a credit card, etc. Really isn't much one can obtain without transparency. Why do some think investing is any different?
If the company has all the relationships you have mentioned, it should anger shareholders and I'll tell you why. If great amounts of money are being produced through these relationships while the share price lingers at $0.10 per share, the company is doing a great disservice to its investors by not letting them know so that they can take advantage of possibly a big opportunity by investing their capital and receiving a good return. Management would not be conducting itself to a degree that they should receive a pat on the back for those kinds of decisions.
It's good to question many things. It's unfortunate that some of the most important questions seem to elude you.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in 't.".
Not exactly sure what I could assist the company with other than encouraging them to be transparent so that they can encourage investment from the investors of the world. In a nut shell, that's pretty much how this whole thing works. You produce a product, you tell people about it, you offer transparency, and you gain investments and exposure.
I'm not sure exactly in "what way" you've concluded I've acted. Care to explain? Far as I know, I've mentioned the subject matter of transparency which is the most basic foundation to investing. Without transparency, you can't get a home loan, a car loan, a school loan, a personal loan, a credit card, etc. Really isn't much one can obtain without transparency. Why do some think investing is any different?
If the company has all the relationships you have mentioned, it should anger shareholders and I'll tell you why. If great amounts of money are being produced through these relationships while the share price lingers at $0.10 per share, the company is doing a great disservice to its investors by not letting them know so that they can take advantage of possibly a big opportunity by investing their capital and receiving a good return. Management would not be conducting itself to a degree that they should receive a pat on the back for those kinds of decisions.
It's good to question many things. It's unfortunate that some of the most important questions seem to elude you.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in 't.".
(0)
(0)