MTVX Stock Alert 08/22/2014 11:25:41 $MTVX Anyone
Post# of 64200
Posted On: 08/22/2014 12:25:44 PM
MTVX Stock Alert 08/22/2014 11:25:41 $MTVX
Anyone that thinks MTVX is going to .01 is as diluted as this company's stock
Get a new keyboard...your cap key is stuck
MTVX Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/APT-Moto-Vox-Grou...TVX-87784/
Last month this stock was getting diluted at about 23 million shares per day on average. Jus for some perspective that's 50% of the daily volume on most days lol. Just for some perspective
Absolutely could be great timing.
8-K coming end of day? Could be a shocker to the upside.
Do not sell into the bid.
$MTVX
Congratulations. Yea paul knopick ussually answers back quick to a** kissing. Probably why he never emails me back I suppose. I'm not to fond of the kissing of the cheeks
Don't know, but, they have REALLY run this one into the DIRT!
Boy o boy, rehashing this again are we? Who on earth knows the real reason Pritt sold, no one, absolutely no one except Pritt himself. Of course everyone has their own theories but in the end it's all bs speculation at it's finest. End of story.
You should ask him what the best company in his opinion was up to 97. GO MTVX
MAYBE THE PLATE WAS TO HEAVY FOR PRITT TO CARRY SO HE PASSED IT ON!
MAYBE PAUL CAN HELP US OUT WITH THIS -
Quote:
Conversion price being at 1c, 2c or 0,005 or at bid price does not determine "better" in anyway. Schissler is being paid per his contract which is $250,000 for 2 years worth of consulting services. He opted to bill monthly so far and received shares in lieu of cash. Getting less or more shares per invoice is not better or worse for him. In terms of consulting fees charged at $250,000, the two agreements ARE THE SAME.
The Q said
"In April 2014, in accordance with a consulting agreement the Company privately issued 25,000,000 shares of common stock to N. Douglas Pritt which had a fair market value of $335,000.00."
Here is his agreement, with the terms of 1¢ as the conversion rate...
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/148652...ex1071.htm
Sadly, he was only able to sell those shares for FAR LESS...
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?action=ge...0001605474
WHY DID HE SELL THOSE 1¢ SHARES FOR SUCH A LOSS IF THE PPS IS GOING HIGHER???
HE GOT OUT @.0026 AND WALKED AWAY WITH MORE THAN HE WOULD GET TODAY...
He's an "insider"...doesn't he KNOW about all the AWESOME REVENUE that will be coming in the 3 and 4th Q's?
Revenue that is alleged to propel MTVX WAY OVER 1¢???
WoW!!! He must not be able to see the forest for the trees...
Too Funny!
BTW...his "term" runs through Dec 2015, and the Q does not say he was "let go"...
unless you can give me a page number for that...
This is all the Q says
"Operating Expenses
Operating expenses have decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013, due primarily to the reduction in payroll expenses and benefits. Professional fees increased due to the legal, accounting and consulting fees we incurred in going public."...
As you can see, actually it states "Professional fees increased due to the legal, accounting and consulting fees we incurred in going public"
Why do you argue that something is "better"? Both had a consulting contract, initial fees $250K. Neither is "better" -- getting more shares is not better nor is getting less shares worse. They will be paid according to contract price. Which part of this are you not understanding? If Pritt got shares at 1c and sold at 0026, that is his fault for not getting the full value of his $250K. If Schissler got shares "more shares" at 0056 and he held to sell at 0012, the impact is still the same. So, "better" is not the proper way to compare these contracts.
I will not be offering additional comments on this.
PAUL HAS ALWAYS ANSWERED MY QUESTIONS!
PRITT WAS THE ONE PASSING THE PLATE TO HELP TROY RAISE THE MTVX PPS! NOW WHOS GOING TO DO THAT IN MANAGEMENT FOR TROY!
TROY COULD END UP ON 20/20. IF HE KEEPS ON PASSING THE PLATE TO RAISE THE PPS ON MTVX.
??? Pritt was let go as part of the employee costs savings in the 10Q...
$MTVX making bank now with his salary gone.
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! I'm not confused at all...
Pritt received 25M shares...that is 250K converted at his "1¢"...
SADLY, for him, he was only able to sell them at .0026...
YIKES! WHAT A DEAL!!!
Pritt did NOT really receive "250K"...unless you can prove otherwise???
I guess he should have WAITED, eh?
Except if he had waited, he'd have been selling for even LESS!
AND the FACT that HE DID SELL, in itself shows that he; even as a person on the "inside", thinks the likelihood of this going OVER "1¢" in the near future is slim to NONE!!!
Tell me, what is your explanation for why Pritt dumped his 1¢ shares for such a LOSS;
IF your theory that this is going over 1¢ in the near future is TRUE???
True, at the moment. But if they do not cover today they may get an 8k shocker to deal with Monday. Believe me, they are thinking about what is coming after hours today. It's going to be an interesting eod.
And I agree...do not sell into the bid.
$MTVX
Anyone that thinks MTVX is going to .01 is as diluted as this company's stock
Get a new keyboard...your cap key is stuck
MTVX Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/APT-Moto-Vox-Grou...TVX-87784/
Last month this stock was getting diluted at about 23 million shares per day on average. Jus for some perspective that's 50% of the daily volume on most days lol. Just for some perspective
Absolutely could be great timing.
8-K coming end of day? Could be a shocker to the upside.
Do not sell into the bid.
$MTVX
Congratulations. Yea paul knopick ussually answers back quick to a** kissing. Probably why he never emails me back I suppose. I'm not to fond of the kissing of the cheeks
Don't know, but, they have REALLY run this one into the DIRT!
Boy o boy, rehashing this again are we? Who on earth knows the real reason Pritt sold, no one, absolutely no one except Pritt himself. Of course everyone has their own theories but in the end it's all bs speculation at it's finest. End of story.
You should ask him what the best company in his opinion was up to 97. GO MTVX
MAYBE THE PLATE WAS TO HEAVY FOR PRITT TO CARRY SO HE PASSED IT ON!
MAYBE PAUL CAN HELP US OUT WITH THIS -
Quote:
Conversion price being at 1c, 2c or 0,005 or at bid price does not determine "better" in anyway. Schissler is being paid per his contract which is $250,000 for 2 years worth of consulting services. He opted to bill monthly so far and received shares in lieu of cash. Getting less or more shares per invoice is not better or worse for him. In terms of consulting fees charged at $250,000, the two agreements ARE THE SAME.
The Q said
"In April 2014, in accordance with a consulting agreement the Company privately issued 25,000,000 shares of common stock to N. Douglas Pritt which had a fair market value of $335,000.00."
Here is his agreement, with the terms of 1¢ as the conversion rate...
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/148652...ex1071.htm
Sadly, he was only able to sell those shares for FAR LESS...
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?action=ge...0001605474
WHY DID HE SELL THOSE 1¢ SHARES FOR SUCH A LOSS IF THE PPS IS GOING HIGHER???
HE GOT OUT @.0026 AND WALKED AWAY WITH MORE THAN HE WOULD GET TODAY...
He's an "insider"...doesn't he KNOW about all the AWESOME REVENUE that will be coming in the 3 and 4th Q's?
Revenue that is alleged to propel MTVX WAY OVER 1¢???
WoW!!! He must not be able to see the forest for the trees...
Too Funny!
BTW...his "term" runs through Dec 2015, and the Q does not say he was "let go"...
unless you can give me a page number for that...
This is all the Q says
"Operating Expenses
Operating expenses have decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013, due primarily to the reduction in payroll expenses and benefits. Professional fees increased due to the legal, accounting and consulting fees we incurred in going public."...
As you can see, actually it states "Professional fees increased due to the legal, accounting and consulting fees we incurred in going public"
Why do you argue that something is "better"? Both had a consulting contract, initial fees $250K. Neither is "better" -- getting more shares is not better nor is getting less shares worse. They will be paid according to contract price. Which part of this are you not understanding? If Pritt got shares at 1c and sold at 0026, that is his fault for not getting the full value of his $250K. If Schissler got shares "more shares" at 0056 and he held to sell at 0012, the impact is still the same. So, "better" is not the proper way to compare these contracts.
I will not be offering additional comments on this.
PAUL HAS ALWAYS ANSWERED MY QUESTIONS!
PRITT WAS THE ONE PASSING THE PLATE TO HELP TROY RAISE THE MTVX PPS! NOW WHOS GOING TO DO THAT IN MANAGEMENT FOR TROY!
TROY COULD END UP ON 20/20. IF HE KEEPS ON PASSING THE PLATE TO RAISE THE PPS ON MTVX.
??? Pritt was let go as part of the employee costs savings in the 10Q...
$MTVX making bank now with his salary gone.
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! I'm not confused at all...
Pritt received 25M shares...that is 250K converted at his "1¢"...
SADLY, for him, he was only able to sell them at .0026...
YIKES! WHAT A DEAL!!!
Pritt did NOT really receive "250K"...unless you can prove otherwise???
I guess he should have WAITED, eh?
Except if he had waited, he'd have been selling for even LESS!
AND the FACT that HE DID SELL, in itself shows that he; even as a person on the "inside", thinks the likelihood of this going OVER "1¢" in the near future is slim to NONE!!!
Tell me, what is your explanation for why Pritt dumped his 1¢ shares for such a LOSS;
IF your theory that this is going over 1¢ in the near future is TRUE???
True, at the moment. But if they do not cover today they may get an 8k shocker to deal with Monday. Believe me, they are thinking about what is coming after hours today. It's going to be an interesting eod.
And I agree...do not sell into the bid.
$MTVX
(0)
(0)