LymPro Version 2 Delayed Testing. I don't beli
Post# of 30065
Posted On: 08/02/2014 10:43:22 AM
LymPro Version 2 Delayed Testing.
I don't believe Gerald is corrupt or that LymPro is a hoax. All the quality diagnostic people who have signed on recently with AMBS wouldn't have come if they felt LymPro wasn't what it was reported to be. And they have complete access to all the testing that has been done on LymPro, far more than we have.
Also, Beckton Dickenson wouldn't have risked damaging their prestige by putting their name on the posters at the worldwide AD Conference in Copenhagen unless they also felt LymPro was what AMBS said it was. BD HAS VALIDATED LYMPRO!! It's precisely for times like these when the market turns on a product releasing partial data, like AMBS has with LymPro, that it's important to have third parties like Beckton Dickenson standing behind it with their validation of the fundamental science.
BD has validated LymPro's former tests done by Steiller in 2002 and 2012 which yielded the 90 & 95% spec & sens data. That was version 1. When the complete testing is done on version 2 it will yield even better results. That hasn't happened yet but the scientists who really understand what AMBS been doing with LymPro are impressed with what they've seen. Only the bashers with ulterior motives and no science backgrounds have been slinging mud at Gerald's integrity! That really sucks in my opinion!! Scum bags all of them for questioning Gerald's character! AMBS acquired version 2 a few months back and I suspect that changed their testing schedule and may be responsible for some of the delays and lack of clarity about the process. But not for a minute do I believe we have anything to worry about regarding the science of LymPro or it's ability to become the industry standard!
We'll recover, quickly.
I don't believe Gerald is corrupt or that LymPro is a hoax. All the quality diagnostic people who have signed on recently with AMBS wouldn't have come if they felt LymPro wasn't what it was reported to be. And they have complete access to all the testing that has been done on LymPro, far more than we have.
Also, Beckton Dickenson wouldn't have risked damaging their prestige by putting their name on the posters at the worldwide AD Conference in Copenhagen unless they also felt LymPro was what AMBS said it was. BD HAS VALIDATED LYMPRO!! It's precisely for times like these when the market turns on a product releasing partial data, like AMBS has with LymPro, that it's important to have third parties like Beckton Dickenson standing behind it with their validation of the fundamental science.
BD has validated LymPro's former tests done by Steiller in 2002 and 2012 which yielded the 90 & 95% spec & sens data. That was version 1. When the complete testing is done on version 2 it will yield even better results. That hasn't happened yet but the scientists who really understand what AMBS been doing with LymPro are impressed with what they've seen. Only the bashers with ulterior motives and no science backgrounds have been slinging mud at Gerald's integrity! That really sucks in my opinion!! Scum bags all of them for questioning Gerald's character! AMBS acquired version 2 a few months back and I suspect that changed their testing schedule and may be responsible for some of the delays and lack of clarity about the process. But not for a minute do I believe we have anything to worry about regarding the science of LymPro or it's ability to become the industry standard!
We'll recover, quickly.
(0)
(0)