It's nice to talk about our competitor, the Bardot

It's nice to talk about our competitor, the Bardot. The only thing lacking in the Bardot are the OSI light sensors, I believe. The real difference is the Bardot needs whole colonies while the MIT 1000 can see much better, smaller amounts of bacteria. What it will boil down to will be cost per tests, cost of machine, mobility of the machine and forward looking research & development. The MIT 1000 has been tested by the company in a remote area. The test was sent into the cloud technology  owned by MMTC through an Iphone. This way, farms can grow their own cultures and send those results from where they are. The bardot is not a portable machine as the MIT 1000, putting the MIT 1000 in the lead, in my opinion.  The upgrade to the MIT 1000 is already on the drawing board. The MIT 1500 will be able see even better with the upcoming model. I think both machines will sell into the wide gap in the market for the new laser technologies. All said, there is plenty of room for everyone. Any other research is invited here. Give us your take on it.