We did, kinda... Yes GC was able to introduce, but

We did, kinda... Yes GC was able to introduce, but actually present? Maybe I'm speaking in semantics, but I don't see it that way.

Those poster sessions are "kinda" like breakout sessions at CME courses. We.. AMBS, werent on the main stage. All the while the hungry attendees are wondering when & what's for lunch, if they are even still there and not wondering the streets of a beautiful city for an hour or two.

As for the las summit, first off, full disclosure, I wasnt around back then, but it doesn't look like they had much if any news to release. It looks as if they were trying to get their house in order and it was also before the Team GC has assembled today.

This Summit is a bit different it seems to me. With all he headlines in the news regarding Concussions ( including at the World Cup) , we will be going in there with the entire Team this time. including Dr. Kirby who will be presenting on behalf of AMBS.

So maybe, with the new info GC has, quiet possibly he's actually opening up the eyes to the soon to be partner this whole entire new potential testing population #$ regarding TBI & Alz. Plus actual disicion makers that can actually play a part in shaping public policy will be in attendance.(for good or bad)

But who knows.

It's only my opinion and how I'm choosing to look at it.

Now, if AMBS doesn't present new data or if the say TA DA, and the S & S #'s are worse, then he could be up for the Most Delusional Award.

And yes, healthy debate is always good and usually pushes conversation and knowledge forward.

Thanks for the discussion.