"i have never expected seamless from a newly minted pubco
(done via a R/M into a shell littered with debris from *priors*)"
4Kids, please don't assume I'm talking to you in this post as you always wonder why I'm concerned about you every time I respond to your posts. Preemptively I'm telling you I'm not and, in a fact I'm not proud of, I'm actually glad you've ridden the stock down this far. This is just addressing a misconception you posted because I don't want others to be misled by your post.
The 310 Holdings shell in which Mr. Bordynuik purchased controlling interest for $80,000 was a clean shell. It was launched likely for the purpose of being sold to someone who wanted to shortcut their way to publicly traded stock. There is no previous "debris" to blame in addition to the boogeymen you are trying to blame for JBI's lack of performance.
Not "seamless" doesn't explain the media credits booked at an artificial price. It doesn't explain why Mr. Bordynuik put out a press release about filing patents when he wasn't even trying to do so at that time. It doesn't explain away the fake $10/bbl crude oil at WTI-$3 prices claim.
4Kids time frame is also highly skewed. A proof-of-concept is usually done early and would simply be putting representative material into a pryolysis processor with the secret catalyst and seeing if what comes out really does have a market value of WTI-$3. It takes maybe a month, not over five or ten years. When a company is reluctant to give the results of the process to the investors who put up more than ample money to launch a company, let alone the maybe $25k-50K to do a solid proof-of-concept, it's a huge red flag.
After a proof of concept, positive results are shouted by the rooftops by honest and fraudulent companies alike--it provides evidence of value and helps shareholders, financing and collaborators. Negative results are disclosed by honest companies but hidden by fraudulent companies. What does that tell you about JBI and the value of the process??
(done via a R/M into a shell littered with debris from *priors*)"
4Kids, please don't assume I'm talking to you in this post as you always wonder why I'm concerned about you every time I respond to your posts. Preemptively I'm telling you I'm not and, in a fact I'm not proud of, I'm actually glad you've ridden the stock down this far. This is just addressing a misconception you posted because I don't want others to be misled by your post.
The 310 Holdings shell in which Mr. Bordynuik purchased controlling interest for $80,000 was a clean shell. It was launched likely for the purpose of being sold to someone who wanted to shortcut their way to publicly traded stock. There is no previous "debris" to blame in addition to the boogeymen you are trying to blame for JBI's lack of performance.
Not "seamless" doesn't explain the media credits booked at an artificial price. It doesn't explain why Mr. Bordynuik put out a press release about filing patents when he wasn't even trying to do so at that time. It doesn't explain away the fake $10/bbl crude oil at WTI-$3 prices claim.
4Kids time frame is also highly skewed. A proof-of-concept is usually done early and would simply be putting representative material into a pryolysis processor with the secret catalyst and seeing if what comes out really does have a market value of WTI-$3. It takes maybe a month, not over five or ten years. When a company is reluctant to give the results of the process to the investors who put up more than ample money to launch a company, let alone the maybe $25k-50K to do a solid proof-of-concept, it's a huge red flag.
After a proof of concept, positive results are shouted by the rooftops by honest and fraudulent companies alike--it provides evidence of value and helps shareholders, financing and collaborators. Negative results are disclosed by honest companies but hidden by fraudulent companies. What does that tell you about JBI and the value of the process??
Plastic2Oil, Inc. (PTOI) Stock Research Links
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.
