What do the board members think of these statement

What do the board members think of these statements (http://www.hotstockmarket.com/t/69868/jbii-jbi-inc/400) made three years ago?

Quote:

---

[5/27/11]
Good GOD man. When will you realize JBII is a totally legitimate company that

1. Is providing a tremenous service for our planet.
2. Is growing by leaps and bounds.
3. Will offer tremendous REWARD for her shareholders.
4. It has NOTHING to do with pumping. It's just support for the most amazing company I've ever seen............

z

---

Quote:

---

[6/4/11]
What about the fact that no less than 2 NYSE companies are doing business with JBII now......... OXY Petroleum, and Rock-Tenn........both billion dollar companies.........You think they didn't check everything before they inked the deals????????..........LOLOL...........z

---

Quote:

---

[5/27/11]
Stocker11 Report on the Event:

There were about 5 dignitaries cutting the ribbon with JB. I hope the entire event will be on the JBI website as it was obvious that the speakers were extremely excited at the prospect of being involved with JBI in the State of New York.

There were about 40 who came from the plastic convention. They all appeared mesmerized by John’s presentation. They had a number of questions that, when answered, appeared to remove any doubts about the technology.

Great day for JBI.

---

I noticed the following in the language of the above posts:

Is providing a tremenous [sic] service for our planet.
Is growing by leaps and bounds

is providing / is growing: NOT "may provide" or "may grow", but IS.

These statements alleged CURRENT FACTS. History has shown that they were both lies.

2 NYSE companies are doing business with JBII now ..........

are doing business with JBII now .... not "may do business in the future", but ARE DOING BUSINESS NOW

Another lie

appeared to remove any doubts about the technology ...

So, 3 years ago all doubts about the technology were legitimately "removed"?

What technology had all doubts removed?

Is the above not a clear lie, since there are nothing BUT doubts about the technology given that neither Bordynuik HIMSELF nor Heddle HIMSELF is willing to pay the parking ticket to get them running again?

What objective, verifiable performance on the part of the processors would be necessary to legitimately claim all doubts about the technology have been removed?