I think you are hitting the nail on the head with
Post# of 3844
Posted On: 12/11/2013 9:56:13 PM
Re: rubbersoul #1215
I think you are hitting the nail on the head with what's needed, and I think this kind of communication needs to continue to be the driving voice from the true investment community. This is how we're going to gain the kind of strength and durability that's going to beat the clear-cut manipulation without calling into question our integrity or moral codes. Facts and fundamentals... Aren't those the reasons why we are all here?
Social media creates a really interesting dynamic, because it not only allows us to have visibility of the company in a more intimate capacity, but it gives them the ability to hear the investment community's direct concerns, interests, and accolades through forums just like this one. So, as we see the group and company grow, this kind of communication needs to continue and be protected for what it is. Illegitimate claims need to be exposed, and our statements need to be grounded in truth. That is not to say that blind faith is the answer, as it never should be in the world of investing. EWSI should ALWAYS strive to impress us, and deliver on their promises. But our scrutiny should be honest should focus on the fundamentals of the company. It's that simple. No elaborate or blatant bashing or pumping schemes. Just honest transparency.
Is that not the way to go?
-LD
Social media creates a really interesting dynamic, because it not only allows us to have visibility of the company in a more intimate capacity, but it gives them the ability to hear the investment community's direct concerns, interests, and accolades through forums just like this one. So, as we see the group and company grow, this kind of communication needs to continue and be protected for what it is. Illegitimate claims need to be exposed, and our statements need to be grounded in truth. That is not to say that blind faith is the answer, as it never should be in the world of investing. EWSI should ALWAYS strive to impress us, and deliver on their promises. But our scrutiny should be honest should focus on the fundamentals of the company. It's that simple. No elaborate or blatant bashing or pumping schemes. Just honest transparency.
Is that not the way to go?
-LD
(0)
(0)