from what I 've seen so far imo said person is eit

from what I 've seen so far imo said person is either an idiot-repeatedly allegedly violating statutory /rule notice requirements re discovery and then bringing 1 attempt after another to blame cwrn for geos own violation of the rules- [crafters do these things on purpose until they capture their mark-in this case the judge-and get the judge to blame cwrn for geo's own failure to comply w discovery rules] or totally manipulated by geo- imo

geo has to get a judgement before it can claim these things -another attempt to manipulate /confuse the judge? ridiculous to ask these things just 2-3 weeks before  11-4-13 tx trial -

besides bob no longer has controlling interest in cwrn -there is now an independent "innocent" [a legal term] 3rd party over which TX court probably does not have Juris and cannot get a receivorship or judgment against-namely brad and cwrn

also arrogant- geo allegedly withheld and or commingled millions from the 1st 2 ships- which prevented cwrn from filing financials, which prevented removal of ce resulting from shorters fraudulent shout of a jan 2011 promo when there was none -and thus caused untold damage to longs,and prevented cwrn from having the money it thought it would have to keep sending new ships out-

so cwrn would be owed millions- so geo brings case in tx in violation of jva re  CA Jurisdiction and separates out a small part of the overall case in an attempt to get a judgment on that small isolated part and wear down their mark- a frivolous suit imo- which imo is the reason for these pretrial games/ manipulations by geo- they imo dont believe they can win on the merits -

and cwrn has 13 counts in its case against geo in CA for scores of millions actual and punitive damages including an alleged pattern of fraud by geo under RICO

all imo