Does GEO's lawyer realize that 17-59(a) is for PO
Post# of 8059
Maybe the judge is an idiot, but I suspect he is not and will shoot this full of holes by the end of the week. Perhaps, Bob and Joe should see this?
Section 17.59:
Post Judgment Relief
(a)
If a money judgment entered under this subchapter is unsatisfied 30 days after it becomes final and if the prevailing party has made a good faith attempt to obtain satisfaction of the judgment, the following presumptions exist with respect to the party against whom the judgment was entered:
(3) that the prevailing party will be materially injured unless a receiver is appointed over the defendant's business; and
(4) that there is no adequate remedy other than receivership available to the prevailing party.
(b)
Subject to the provisions of Subsection (a) of this section, a prevailing party may move that the defendant show cause why a receiver should not be appointed. Upon adequate notice and hearing, the court shall appoint a receiver over the defendant's business unless the defendant proves that all of the presumptions set forth in Subsection (a) of this section are not applicable.
(c)
The order appointing a receiver must clearly state whether the receiver will have general power to manage and operate the defendant's business or have power to manage only a defendant's finances. The order shall limit the duration of the receivership to such time as the judgment or judgments awarded under this subchapter are paid in full. Where there are judgments against a defendant which have been awarded to more than one plaintiff, the court shall have discretion to take any action necessary to efficiently operate a receivership in order to accomplish the purpose of collecting the judgments.
Added by Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 322, ch. 143, Sec. 1, eff. May 21, 1973. Amended by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 604, ch. 216, Sec. 9, eff. May 23, 1977.
http://www.weblaws.org/texas/laws/tex._bus._a...ent_relief
(0)
(0)