Hi JP. I am not very pleased myself with the volume of shares being crossed out in the market.

Its pure speculation on my part on who is doing the selling. But my money is on

Pierce Fleming as the culprit based on history. History has proven the culprit in

situations like CYBK's ends up that the previous management are the sellers of shares that

come off restriction with the shell changing hands. Time will tell here but if there was not pre

arranged buyers for these shares we would easily be sub penny or worse. We are not

sub penny because the seller and buyer do not want that to be the result here IMO.

Perhaps the audited financials will shed more light on the trading volume once it is

filed in terms of who. As someone who lent money, I am not getting any more information

than anyone who did not lend money. I was told my loan will be paid back in July and the filing

the other day confirmed that information. I intend to collect on my loan by any and all means

necessary. Hopefully it won't come down to collecting on the loan in the court system. I believe

Clarke and Minellis will avoid the worst case scenario of the court system because if I file a

claim on my loan in default as well as the other two gentlemen who loaned along side of me,

then the S-1, should it be filed, will not be approved by the SEC until any and all lawsuits are

settled. Looking for the best outcome here for all of us investors and I believe Clarke and

Minellis are as well IMO !

Cheers, PC