(Total Views: 103)
Posted On: 10/26/2024 11:16:37 PM
Post# of 13498
You’re really confused. You stated:
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=6725805
Snpw Reported:
The snpw filing doesn’t not support your post stating they could not secure funding.. This is you sharing your opinion.
The reason I am taking you to task is you used your opinion as justification that snpw informed shareholders what happened to the other states they were reportedly working with. This is inaccurate.
You have an out - show where snpw notified shareholders that they were no longer pursuing additional states for the Medi due to financing.
The ball is in your court. And stop with the double talk to confuse it isn’t working. Simply provide a link where snpw stated they were no longer pursuing other states for Medi due to them being unable to obtain financing to take them to other states.
My opinions.
Quote:
July 2021 the project was denied by RI-DEM the company was unable to obtain funding to take it to another state, so later that year the company decided to transition to the solar sector. signing deals with FoxEss, Pt.IDN and Marine Batter then later adding GEP New Energy to their Group.
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=6725805
Snpw Reported:
Quote:
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On May 28, 2021, Sun Pacific Holding Corp. (the “Company”) entered into a Net Profit Participation Agreement and Assignment (the “Agreement”) on behalf of their wholly owned subsidiary MedRecycler, LLC (“MRLLC”) and with MedRecycler-RI, Inc. (“MRRI”) wherein in order to secure permanent financing for their medical waste to energy project (the “Project”), the Company has agreed to relinquish its interest in the equity of MRRI held by MRLLC while the Company is provided an economic interest in the Project without liabilities .
The snpw filing doesn’t not support your post stating they could not secure funding.. This is you sharing your opinion.
The reason I am taking you to task is you used your opinion as justification that snpw informed shareholders what happened to the other states they were reportedly working with. This is inaccurate.
You have an out - show where snpw notified shareholders that they were no longer pursuing additional states for the Medi due to financing.
The ball is in your court. And stop with the double talk to confuse it isn’t working. Simply provide a link where snpw stated they were no longer pursuing other states for Medi due to them being unable to obtain financing to take them to other states.
My opinions.
(0)
(0)
