I thought the COO was responsible for Operations.  In fact, he probably caused the company from being CFP in the 1st quarter.  We, as shareholders, have the right to know what we are getting for the money we are paying the Executive.  If delayed parts caused the processor to be delayed is that not the responsibility of the Chief Operations Officer.  He's being paid to ensure the Chief of Technology has everything he needs to repair and complete processors.  If that's not his job what does he do exactly with his 24-32 hour week.