(Total Views: 650)
Posted On: 04/28/2024 8:46:17 PM
Post# of 148870
Man, you are so close. You’re right there. You can feel it, but not quite see it. Mind if I provide a little guidance?
You wrote this:
“Genentech, Wyeth, Senator questioning FDA on practices, long before covid.
Pre-covid, during covid, they haven't understood MAB/Cytolin/Leronlimab.
Yep, you're right about their "perception", because in the emails, I think it was Suzzane reply to Murray, re r. J --- if he thinks it's an immunosuppressive, it's a problem.
That was not even close to what Dr. J was saying.
The Supreme Court ruling allows them to be sloppy, slow or flat out not give effort.
I'm going to stay in a happy mindset of our 2024 FDA dealings, like Dr. J is. Topped off with MGK_2 reminding pharma has no head to head weapon.
From a historical Letter, to a historical lift, I'm optimistic your list of 90, turns into reality.
________
"For example, if someone is injured by a dangerous or defective drug that was approved by the FDA, they can still sue. However, the FDA is viewed as a regulatory body or gatekeeper, so the complaint should be directed at the company that made the bad product."
Perhaps, try it like a this:
Genentech, Wyeth, Senators questioning,
FDA practices before this sequestering,
Pre-COVID, Long-COVID, thru all the labs,
They’ve not understood our Leronlimab.
Might be Suzie’s reply to "Mr." Murray,
Immuno suppression does get a bit furry,
The Courts may be sniffing many poppies,
Yet all is well ‘cuz Dr. Jay is not sloppy.
Not investing advice, just personal feelings,
Lalezari is fine with the FDA's dealings,
Dangerous, defective, mis-handled approvals,
The FDA made for our C-suite removals.
From deadly letters, to life-giving lifts,
Our hopeful ninety, begets realities list.
You wrote this:
“Genentech, Wyeth, Senator questioning FDA on practices, long before covid.
Pre-covid, during covid, they haven't understood MAB/Cytolin/Leronlimab.
Yep, you're right about their "perception", because in the emails, I think it was Suzzane reply to Murray, re r. J --- if he thinks it's an immunosuppressive, it's a problem.
That was not even close to what Dr. J was saying.
The Supreme Court ruling allows them to be sloppy, slow or flat out not give effort.
I'm going to stay in a happy mindset of our 2024 FDA dealings, like Dr. J is. Topped off with MGK_2 reminding pharma has no head to head weapon.
From a historical Letter, to a historical lift, I'm optimistic your list of 90, turns into reality.
________
"For example, if someone is injured by a dangerous or defective drug that was approved by the FDA, they can still sue. However, the FDA is viewed as a regulatory body or gatekeeper, so the complaint should be directed at the company that made the bad product."
Perhaps, try it like a this:
Genentech, Wyeth, Senators questioning,
FDA practices before this sequestering,
Pre-COVID, Long-COVID, thru all the labs,
They’ve not understood our Leronlimab.
Might be Suzie’s reply to "Mr." Murray,
Immuno suppression does get a bit furry,
The Courts may be sniffing many poppies,
Yet all is well ‘cuz Dr. Jay is not sloppy.
Not investing advice, just personal feelings,
Lalezari is fine with the FDA's dealings,
Dangerous, defective, mis-handled approvals,
The FDA made for our C-suite removals.
From deadly letters, to life-giving lifts,
Our hopeful ninety, begets realities list.
(11)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
