Why, does LL "need" to be accepted by pharma? It seems like the thoughts are they either love LL, or want to kill it.

So why not take that away?
If any drug is to do that, it's going to be this one.

If, if, others outside of pharma, we're to fund certain # of trials, trials succeed, drug becomes available, doctors will prescribe LL.

Far as I know, maybe nieve, doctors are not rewarded by pharma as to their prescription(s), etc..

Guess kind of like cops writing tickets @ end of month.
Rewarding hitting a quota.

Of course against their Oath, that I do know know.
Just going on common sense. (lol)

If you have Mfgr:

Trials @ prominent centers. (FDA approved)
FDA drug approval(s).
Own mfgr'ing. (FDA approved)
Distribution. (FDA approved)
Drug gets into hands of doctors.

Business model is the norm, until a safer, better & cheaper one, comes into existence.

It's always said, it's doctors who choose the treatments. Whatever the best is.

& yes sir... that's what I loved seeing in the emails---- everything Dr. J said he thought &/or had done, was in those.

Yep....he did contact Gates/Bill foundations.
During covid, said because would need alot of LL.

So now scuttle Samsung & the LL need is very possibly a multiples of need.

But just a quick thinking out loud... : )

Shall see...