(Total Views: 442)
Posted On: 04/17/2024 2:03:47 PM
Post# of 148876
Well, I'd hang on a second. Just because they are supposed to engage in structured settlement negotiations doesn't mean anything has been agreed to necessarily. "If" is still where we're at. Amarex can always decide that they don't like CYDY's number or time frame and vice versa.
I believe it's more like Amarex saying "IF we wanted to pay you $X and could do it over X amount of time, would you be amenable to discussing it?" or CYDY saying "We want $X and for it to be paid in X manner." Then they try to talk it out. Hopefully until it is settled without the need to wait until next year (2025) which is most likely when the arbitrator would give their ruling.
I wonder why the final hearing was pushed 3 months.
I believe it's more like Amarex saying "IF we wanted to pay you $X and could do it over X amount of time, would you be amenable to discussing it?" or CYDY saying "We want $X and for it to be paid in X manner." Then they try to talk it out. Hopefully until it is settled without the need to wait until next year (2025) which is most likely when the arbitrator would give their ruling.
I wonder why the final hearing was pushed 3 months.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
