(Total Views: 91)
Posted On: 02/18/2024 12:47:04 PM
Post# of 13182
Re: Wallstreet1234 #6311
Where do you come up with that?
If the AS was maxed out.
But AS is not OS, and there are anti-dilutions clauses the lender(s) could put into the contract. to protect them while keeping the OS low.
Remember the other part of that scenario it is to the benefit of the one coming into the company to be on a Major exchange rather then the OTC, so it is to their advantage to keep the OS as low as possible as long as possible to obtain a higher stock price and start creating real value before they dilute.
Since inception SNPW has operated where OS has always been below the AS, hasn't it?
I can show you thousand of companies where their OS is no where near their AS.
So your point has no bearing in this discussion.
Quote:
Talk about dilution. So pre split holders own less than 250 Thousand shares post split and the shares used for the partners that you reference (49.99%) would own roughly 500 MILLION shares.
If the AS was maxed out.
But AS is not OS, and there are anti-dilutions clauses the lender(s) could put into the contract. to protect them while keeping the OS low.
Remember the other part of that scenario it is to the benefit of the one coming into the company to be on a Major exchange rather then the OTC, so it is to their advantage to keep the OS as low as possible as long as possible to obtain a higher stock price and start creating real value before they dilute.
Since inception SNPW has operated where OS has always been below the AS, hasn't it?
I can show you thousand of companies where their OS is no where near their AS.
So your point has no bearing in this discussion.
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼