(Total Views: 208)
Posted On: 07/13/2023 12:14:57 PM
Post# of 7802
Re: Coat Tail Rider #7628
EXPL was required to disclose the material event, but there was no requirement to disclose who it was with. Is SFRX not required to disclose? You brag about them filing.
EXPL disclosed in their agreement with GMAR an airplane had been located (Target 77). They showed the image. That led to the deal.
They showed the Connaught and Pulaski images from the side scans. They found what they were looking for because they knew where to look.
SFRX claims they have a device that can see gold and silver under the sand, but they can’t demonstrate it works.
And you’re saying it’s okay to tell everyone it works, even if you can’t show why you believe it does.
You’re a good fit with SFRX.
Keep pumping Crusty. You’re doing great.
EXPL disclosed in their agreement with GMAR an airplane had been located (Target 77). They showed the image. That led to the deal.
They showed the Connaught and Pulaski images from the side scans. They found what they were looking for because they knew where to look.
SFRX claims they have a device that can see gold and silver under the sand, but they can’t demonstrate it works.
And you’re saying it’s okay to tell everyone it works, even if you can’t show why you believe it does.
You’re a good fit with SFRX.
Keep pumping Crusty. You’re doing great.
(0)
(0)
