(Total Views: 410)
Posted On: 06/22/2023 11:17:41 AM
Post# of 148903
You're not wrong. An injunction is an injunction, whether or not it's a preliminary injunction. It's still an injunction.
And NSF was a party to that injunction. This potentially gives us a window into the thinking of Sidley-Austin, because they are the ones who filed the request for the injunction, not Nader himself.
It's futile to try to get someone to believe facts when their whole self-image is based on "I'm always right and I know more than you do." Ignoring absurd comments is the best tactic.
And NSF was a party to that injunction. This potentially gives us a window into the thinking of Sidley-Austin, because they are the ones who filed the request for the injunction, not Nader himself.
It's futile to try to get someone to believe facts when their whole self-image is based on "I'm always right and I know more than you do." Ignoring absurd comments is the best tactic.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
