Craig, perhaps you skipped the law school class that covered motions to vacate an arbitrator's judgment. You are incorrect saying that there is no possibility of appeal.

Quote:

---

Asking a court to vacate, modify, or confirm an arbitration award will usually raise questions about contract interpretation and enforcement. Contract law is usually state law. Thus, a motion to vacate, modify, or confirm arbitration awards will generally present questions of state law rather than federal law. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/supreme-...firming-or

---

Clearly there would be no need to discuss motions to vacate an arbitrator's ruling if it were not possible to make a motion to vacate.

and Westlaw is generally considered to be a reliable source, even though you point out, inexplicably because I have never referenced her, that my mother is not. Perhaps you rely on your mother for legal advice and assumed incorrectly that I do also?

Quote:

---

an arbitrator's decision binds the parties unless the arbitration or the arbitrator was fundamentally unfair . https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-la...pe=Default

---

Again, there would be no need to discuss this if there were not a pathway to appeal an unfair decision.

There are also many, many articles that address the issue of fraud. New York and California appear to have somewhat different interpretations of how fraud is to be addressed.

Nevertheless, your blanket statement that there is absolutely no recourse after arbitration -- is incorrect.

And in the future, stop attempting to be clever or funny by dragging my dead mother into this. It is neither clever nor funny, it is just disgusting.