(Total Views: 480)
 Posted On: 05/10/2022 3:16:57 PM 
  
		  		    Post#  of 158168		    
			
		      
  
 Re: craigakess #123040 
          
	I think you missed the point of my post. Next time I will hold off and wait to post to make sure it's not ambiguous. 
Others were claiming NWBO had good results, yet it dropped from $1.82 yesterday to a low of $0.3862 today to recover to $0.895 at the moment.
If math is math and numbers are either good or they are not, and people claim NWBO good, why did NWBO take such a dump?
Is it because company release of results are inherently ambiguous?
Is it better to have it released in a peer reviewed Journal?
So, math is not just math, as you propound.
 	
 
Others were claiming NWBO had good results, yet it dropped from $1.82 yesterday to a low of $0.3862 today to recover to $0.895 at the moment.
If math is math and numbers are either good or they are not, and people claim NWBO good, why did NWBO take such a dump?
Is it because company release of results are inherently ambiguous?
Is it better to have it released in a peer reviewed Journal?
So, math is not just math, as you propound.
 (9)
(9) (0)
(0) 
      			












