(Total Views: 459)
Posted On: 05/10/2022 3:16:57 PM
Post# of 148932
Re: craigakess #123040
I think you missed the point of my post. Next time I will hold off and wait to post to make sure it's not ambiguous.
Others were claiming NWBO had good results, yet it dropped from $1.82 yesterday to a low of $0.3862 today to recover to $0.895 at the moment.
If math is math and numbers are either good or they are not, and people claim NWBO good, why did NWBO take such a dump?
Is it because company release of results are inherently ambiguous?
Is it better to have it released in a peer reviewed Journal?
So, math is not just math, as you propound.
Others were claiming NWBO had good results, yet it dropped from $1.82 yesterday to a low of $0.3862 today to recover to $0.895 at the moment.
If math is math and numbers are either good or they are not, and people claim NWBO good, why did NWBO take such a dump?
Is it because company release of results are inherently ambiguous?
Is it better to have it released in a peer reviewed Journal?
So, math is not just math, as you propound.
(9)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
