(Total Views: 449)
Posted On: 05/10/2022 3:08:14 PM
Post# of 154159
Hey Marc.
Well, as I see it, math is math and the numbers are either good or they're not. And by not, I don't necessarily mean bad as in failure, I mean "not good" as in "Well, they're ok, but better if you hold your head at a 37 degree angle to the left and squint a bit" which is much like a lot of other trial results CYDY has had. Bad? NO! But undeniable? Still no.
I don't think there is ambiguity unless something was done incorrectly or they have to massage the data, which again, means it wasn't necessarily a failure, but it wasn't undeniable either.
I think we just weren't undeniable here because again, math is math.
Well, as I see it, math is math and the numbers are either good or they're not. And by not, I don't necessarily mean bad as in failure, I mean "not good" as in "Well, they're ok, but better if you hold your head at a 37 degree angle to the left and squint a bit" which is much like a lot of other trial results CYDY has had. Bad? NO! But undeniable? Still no.
I don't think there is ambiguity unless something was done incorrectly or they have to massage the data, which again, means it wasn't necessarily a failure, but it wasn't undeniable either.
I think we just weren't undeniable here because again, math is math.
(1)
(0)
