(Total Views: 576)
Posted On: 02/16/2022 2:19:35 PM
Post# of 148892
Re: Cassandra X #118274
The suit is going forward in the ARBITRATION, not the District Court case.
Who are the parties to the arbitration? You don't know, do you?
Where they ever dropped from the arbitration? Has any PR or 8K said this? So, you don't know, do you?
Where they ever in the arbitration? Has any PR or 8K said this? The arbitration was apparently filed at around the same time as the District Court case, so presumably the parties were the same, i.e., CytoDyn v Amarex and NSF, but we really don't know unless they disclosed this in PR, an 8K, a 10K, a 10Q or in District Court filing. Maybe someone else has seen this somewhere, but I don't recall seeing it.
But, the District Court case is about the INJUNCTION ONLY, and the case has been closed, to be opened only if there are problems with the Injunction, so no, unlikely that NSF will be brought back into the INJUNCTION sue against Amarex.
However, they very well might STILL BE A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION.
Who are the parties to the arbitration? You don't know, do you?
Where they ever dropped from the arbitration? Has any PR or 8K said this? So, you don't know, do you?
Where they ever in the arbitration? Has any PR or 8K said this? The arbitration was apparently filed at around the same time as the District Court case, so presumably the parties were the same, i.e., CytoDyn v Amarex and NSF, but we really don't know unless they disclosed this in PR, an 8K, a 10K, a 10Q or in District Court filing. Maybe someone else has seen this somewhere, but I don't recall seeing it.
But, the District Court case is about the INJUNCTION ONLY, and the case has been closed, to be opened only if there are problems with the Injunction, so no, unlikely that NSF will be brought back into the INJUNCTION sue against Amarex.
However, they very well might STILL BE A PARTY TO THE ARBITRATION.
(10)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
