(Total Views: 618)
Posted On: 02/02/2022 5:00:57 PM
Post# of 149994
This is my fear as well.
“ if they want to raise funds with Paulson it has to be without Nader?”
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=633...z7JmD9VU00
Could explain the Paulson lawyer, Ms. Urbach being named to the board. My fear being that this is the reason for Nader’s dismisssl, the cancelled CC. Nothing less , nothing more.
My gut says a partnership is in the works. But this is my fear.
Only question I still can’t explain in this scenario, is why no NASH top line report.
“ if they want to raise funds with Paulson it has to be without Nader?”
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=633...z7JmD9VU00
Could explain the Paulson lawyer, Ms. Urbach being named to the board. My fear being that this is the reason for Nader’s dismisssl, the cancelled CC. Nothing less , nothing more.
My gut says a partnership is in the works. But this is my fear.
Only question I still can’t explain in this scenario, is why no NASH top line report.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
