(Total Views: 453)
Posted On: 02/02/2022 4:20:42 PM
Post# of 6857
Sharing information from the public domain is acceptable.
Divulging mortgage information is fair, likewise, highlighting the number of court cases Doc has been involved in for non-payment of debt is relevant also.
Doc is the figurehead of a public company who is not providing news to his shareholders - if he is in financial difficulty or distress, it would be a very valid concern to shareholders - and therefore can be considered as legitimate due diligence.
It's part and parcel of being the public face of a public company, especially when that individual is the overwhelming majority shareholder and overall decision maker - after all, his actions, and the actions of others filing cases against him, could have a direct bearing on the success / failure / continuance of the company itself.
Divulging mortgage information is fair, likewise, highlighting the number of court cases Doc has been involved in for non-payment of debt is relevant also.
Doc is the figurehead of a public company who is not providing news to his shareholders - if he is in financial difficulty or distress, it would be a very valid concern to shareholders - and therefore can be considered as legitimate due diligence.
It's part and parcel of being the public face of a public company, especially when that individual is the overwhelming majority shareholder and overall decision maker - after all, his actions, and the actions of others filing cases against him, could have a direct bearing on the success / failure / continuance of the company itself.
(7)
(0)
