(Total Views: 492)
Posted On: 01/24/2022 3:17:50 PM
Post# of 154003
Here is why I disagree (of course, right?):
You say a partnership is "costly" as I say it is more costly to NOT have one.
Sure, we'd ALL love an EUA, however it should be remembered that each step forward is territory into which current management has ZERO experience.
What the above means to me, is that with a partnership will come talented, experienced individuals who can help move the ball forward in a way that CYDY just cannot do on its own. That much is clear. No experience, no clout with the government agencies and no real infrastructure do not a strong company make. I would welcome a partnership and as I have said, any partnership includes NP not being quite so "in charge" as he currently is, because too much money and too little time will be at stake.
You say a partnership is "costly" as I say it is more costly to NOT have one.
Sure, we'd ALL love an EUA, however it should be remembered that each step forward is territory into which current management has ZERO experience.
What the above means to me, is that with a partnership will come talented, experienced individuals who can help move the ball forward in a way that CYDY just cannot do on its own. That much is clear. No experience, no clout with the government agencies and no real infrastructure do not a strong company make. I would welcome a partnership and as I have said, any partnership includes NP not being quite so "in charge" as he currently is, because too much money and too little time will be at stake.
(7)
(0)
