(Total Views: 556)
Posted On: 01/07/2022 9:11:17 AM
Post# of 148899
Re: craigakess #114082
I invested in the mab & voted for the man. Would do so again. It would be an easier decision this time, given the "learning experience of last time"
I did not invest in a fortune 500 company, so I do not expect to have a fortune 500 CEO.
The competition last time around was a joke, imho. I found it comical that prior to having a ship, they could chart a course through unknown waters. Downright "dinghy"
pun intended). They definitely did not have a resume' worthy of this boards high expectations of late. Who does? What would they promise? How would they deliver? Who would benefit? What fortune 500 manager in good standing & not a crook would roll the dice & take charge of an OTC?
In a "tit for tat" environment, one might suggest that NP is stuck with us. He just can't profit from trying to get rid of us.
Having had the privilege of being the "fly on the wall" in an environment where CEOs routinely criticized each other, I would suggest that the desire for power drives them & luck or lack of it defines the vast majority. Largely a necessary hitching point for those fighting for control or looking for direction. They are basically bought not paid.
For an upstart company it is more about putting together a team with a shared vision of success. NP has delivered a team that is putting all it's focus & pressure on the mab, not the man.
Given that we "ALL" agree that the mab is undeniable if not undisputable, how is that not a good thing?
I did not invest in a fortune 500 company, so I do not expect to have a fortune 500 CEO.
The competition last time around was a joke, imho. I found it comical that prior to having a ship, they could chart a course through unknown waters. Downright "dinghy"
pun intended). They definitely did not have a resume' worthy of this boards high expectations of late. Who does? What would they promise? How would they deliver? Who would benefit? What fortune 500 manager in good standing & not a crook would roll the dice & take charge of an OTC? In a "tit for tat" environment, one might suggest that NP is stuck with us. He just can't profit from trying to get rid of us.
Having had the privilege of being the "fly on the wall" in an environment where CEOs routinely criticized each other, I would suggest that the desire for power drives them & luck or lack of it defines the vast majority. Largely a necessary hitching point for those fighting for control or looking for direction. They are basically bought not paid.
For an upstart company it is more about putting together a team with a shared vision of success. NP has delivered a team that is putting all it's focus & pressure on the mab, not the man.
Given that we "ALL" agree that the mab is undeniable if not undisputable, how is that not a good thing?
(6)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
