(Total Views: 538)
Posted On: 10/05/2021 6:25:52 PM
Post# of 155734
It's possible CytoDyn knew Amarex was a lost cause when they didn't provide the proper tables in the rolling HIV filing - remember way back then?
But no divorce then - likely because NP decided he couldn't rock the boat on ongoing trials. Maybe Recknor finally said pull the plug?
Whatever - we're screwed more now than if we had cut the cord earlier. Having been in management, it's management's job not to have your whole corporation hung out on the performance of a proven-failure partner.
Can the researchers here tell when the legal back-and-forth with Amarex started?
But no divorce then - likely because NP decided he couldn't rock the boat on ongoing trials. Maybe Recknor finally said pull the plug?
Whatever - we're screwed more now than if we had cut the cord earlier. Having been in management, it's management's job not to have your whole corporation hung out on the performance of a proven-failure partner.
Can the researchers here tell when the legal back-and-forth with Amarex started?
(4)
(0)
