(Total Views: 428)
Posted On: 09/24/2021 1:39:22 PM
Post# of 22465
That post is proof of what I said in my last post, that you would rather have your investment fail rather than let Squires complete the S-1.
Your "100% failure rate" is false because he's done deals with China, India (ongoing) and Pasaca (unknown) which were major deals. They were extremely creative and had high potential. You might as well said every businessman and inventor was a failure...before they succeeded.
Squires is driven to succeed and he will.
Your accusations -
When you actually think about it, even you have to concede it's not the complexity of the facts that has prevented the filing, it's the implication of the story told by those facts. It's that the disclosure of these facts will show somebody's been either lying, stealing, or grossly incompetent."
Face the facts, two SEC 10-Q, which carry penalties for what you accuse him of, and none are charged.
Facts are we will have to wait until the S-1 to know what the financials are for the last 18 months and accusations without proof will not stand on this board.
Your "100% failure rate" is false because he's done deals with China, India (ongoing) and Pasaca (unknown) which were major deals. They were extremely creative and had high potential. You might as well said every businessman and inventor was a failure...before they succeeded.
Squires is driven to succeed and he will.
Your accusations -
When you actually think about it, even you have to concede it's not the complexity of the facts that has prevented the filing, it's the implication of the story told by those facts. It's that the disclosure of these facts will show somebody's been either lying, stealing, or grossly incompetent."
Face the facts, two SEC 10-Q, which carry penalties for what you accuse him of, and none are charged.
Facts are we will have to wait until the S-1 to know what the financials are for the last 18 months and accusations without proof will not stand on this board.
(0)
(0)
