(Total Views: 399)
Posted On: 08/26/2021 4:10:32 PM
Post# of 22461
Now to my own thoughts. I believe, at the very least, the shareholder update should have been prepared in plain English. First: Tell us if the deal with Pasaca is still in play and alive, yes or no. Second: I believe Pasaca gave Squires the opportunity to produce whatever it was they agreed upon, of which we don't know, and Squires couldn't produce. Never developed a final product. End of story. Pasaca cut him loose.
Third: We are once again chasing the carrot of something new in development. That could be an idea, or something on paper, or in such an early stage that it will take years to accomplish. We don't know, especially if it needs FDA approval. Years and years away. Now a company in Canada is in play. Sound familiar? And finally Squires is saying to all of us, "it is my way or the highway". You vote to bring your share value to sub-penny or I will shut the whole thing down. F..K you very much. I could be on but it is pointless...............
Third: We are once again chasing the carrot of something new in development. That could be an idea, or something on paper, or in such an early stage that it will take years to accomplish. We don't know, especially if it needs FDA approval. Years and years away. Now a company in Canada is in play. Sound familiar? And finally Squires is saying to all of us, "it is my way or the highway". You vote to bring your share value to sub-penny or I will shut the whole thing down. F..K you very much. I could be on but it is pointless...............
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼