I have worked with large bureaucracies for over 25 years, none of them have been the FDA. IMO there is a stench to this thing and I'd like to have further information to see if the meat is bad. I'm not a statistician, MD, scientist, etc. I'm just a two bit peddler. But to me, under the circumstances of an extreme pandemic, the data looks like life saving data. Others here are better at such and I subject my views to theirs.

As I understand it there are Covid EUA approved drugs. If it's a law they have to meet 0.05 p value how many of them met that value on a legitimate primary end point? What beneficial data did they get approved on? What would a chart comparison look like with all EUA approved therapeutics data listed in comparison with LL's?

If a comparison shows bias let's highlight it. If we have a legitimate case let's advertise it. CYDY can't. They have to play nice with the FDA, but I/we can be loud and obnoxious IF WE HAVE A CASE. If we do there has to be a few prominent reporters and politicians who would love a good cause. Perhaps social media could be used for a good purpose for a change. Doctor 580 says EUAs were designed for drugs like ours. Is he/she right? If so why the slow roll?

Can we show our data, make a case compared other approvals, highlight statements by Woodcock, and other potentially helpful quotes, develop a White Paper of sorts? If indeed we have a case then we SCREEM BLOODY EFFin Murder. Because folks, if we have a case it is BLOODY EFFin MURDER.

If we don't have a case, we can shut the hell up, and have another Martini, and wait another few months.