(Total Views: 611)
Posted On: 11/20/2020 3:25:43 PM
Post# of 154867
I am saying the effective trial size was more like 180, not 30,000.
Whether you can obtain statistical significance with an effective population size of 180 is another matter altogether.
Some people are touting the trial size as being 30,000 to 40,000, but this is not statistically accurate.
It's more on the order of an effective patient population of somewhere between our CD-10 and our CD-12.
The only patients that really count are those that were exposed to the virus, a number we can't know, but can only estimate. But, it is no where near 30,000, and much closer to about 150 to 200.
Whether you can obtain statistical significance with an effective population size of 180 is another matter altogether.
Some people are touting the trial size as being 30,000 to 40,000, but this is not statistically accurate.
It's more on the order of an effective patient population of somewhere between our CD-10 and our CD-12.
The only patients that really count are those that were exposed to the virus, a number we can't know, but can only estimate. But, it is no where near 30,000, and much closer to about 150 to 200.
(2)
(1)
