(Total Views: 527)
Posted On: 10/05/2020 10:50:18 AM
Post# of 22467
I posted three simple facts:
WHO
Texas Supreme Court
WHAT
Reply to Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of K&L Gates LLP (direct quote from Court's website)
WHERE
A direct link to document
My simple objective was to inform people that the document had been posted. So here, go read this document and reach your own conclusions, or at least be informed that the case is still proceeding.
If you read the document or the Conclusion that I copied for you, then it is obvious that this was not the Court's verdict, but K&L's reply to QMC's previous filing (Response to Petition for Review).
WHO
Texas Supreme Court
WHAT
Reply to Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of K&L Gates LLP (direct quote from Court's website)
WHERE
A direct link to document
My simple objective was to inform people that the document had been posted. So here, go read this document and reach your own conclusions, or at least be informed that the case is still proceeding.
If you read the document or the Conclusion that I copied for you, then it is obvious that this was not the Court's verdict, but K&L's reply to QMC's previous filing (Response to Petition for Review).
(0)
(1)
