(Total Views: 877)
Posted On: 08/07/2020 1:21:46 AM
Post# of 151807
I wholeheartedly agree Cdiddy. We would not be submitting an application to the U.K. for approval in COVID-19, if the data was not going to have a significant impact...."crushing the P Value."
PLUS WE'RE AT 173 PATIENTS NOW!! I know that's not 195, but I think Tues last week we were at 161. So we're moving along nicely. Not as fast as I, or many others would have liked, but we're doing well. 195 is within reach.
I love Nader's backhanded play against the FDA dosage switcheroo of 350mg vs 700mg with HIV Combo. He's going to submit to the U.K. EXACTLY what FDA should have let us submit to them over 1 year, as a 350mg dosage (Which is what the trial dosage was).
Is this Nader's ACE up the sleeve? I don't know, but it sure feels that way.
PLUS WE'RE AT 173 PATIENTS NOW!! I know that's not 195, but I think Tues last week we were at 161. So we're moving along nicely. Not as fast as I, or many others would have liked, but we're doing well. 195 is within reach.
I love Nader's backhanded play against the FDA dosage switcheroo of 350mg vs 700mg with HIV Combo. He's going to submit to the U.K. EXACTLY what FDA should have let us submit to them over 1 year, as a 350mg dosage (Which is what the trial dosage was).
Is this Nader's ACE up the sleeve? I don't know, but it sure feels that way.
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
