(Total Views: 624)
Posted On: 08/03/2020 6:40:31 PM
Post# of 154064
thanks CD. From page 16:
In studies with serious outcomes, all parties would wish that any major treatment advance be identified and made available as soon as possible. It is critical, however, that the study yield a valid and definitive result. Thus, tensions between ethical and scientific considerations may arise. Consider, for example, a placebo-controlled trial of a new product for a serious illness or condition for which there is no standard treatment. If the emerging data suggest that those receiving the treatment are doing better, one might expect that a DMC would consider whether the study should be terminated earlier than planned. Estimates of treatment effect, however, will be unstable at early points in a study, and the chance is substantial of observing a nominally statistically significant benefit (e.g., p<0.05) at one of multiple interim analyses during a study of an ineffective product (see Section 4.4.2). A DMC, guided by a pre-specified statistical monitoring plan acceptable to both the DMC and the study leadership, will generally be charged with recommending early termination on the basis of a positive result only when the data are truly compelling and the risk of a false positive conclusion is acceptably low.
So this guideline does anticipate the need for adjudication in the case of a deadly disease, and I think it says that the adjudication is accomplished statistically using pre-specified numbers.
In studies with serious outcomes, all parties would wish that any major treatment advance be identified and made available as soon as possible. It is critical, however, that the study yield a valid and definitive result. Thus, tensions between ethical and scientific considerations may arise. Consider, for example, a placebo-controlled trial of a new product for a serious illness or condition for which there is no standard treatment. If the emerging data suggest that those receiving the treatment are doing better, one might expect that a DMC would consider whether the study should be terminated earlier than planned. Estimates of treatment effect, however, will be unstable at early points in a study, and the chance is substantial of observing a nominally statistically significant benefit (e.g., p<0.05) at one of multiple interim analyses during a study of an ineffective product (see Section 4.4.2). A DMC, guided by a pre-specified statistical monitoring plan acceptable to both the DMC and the study leadership, will generally be charged with recommending early termination on the basis of a positive result only when the data are truly compelling and the risk of a false positive conclusion is acceptably low.
So this guideline does anticipate the need for adjudication in the case of a deadly disease, and I think it says that the adjudication is accomplished statistically using pre-specified numbers.
(1)
(0)
