(Total Views: 374)
Posted On: 11/02/2019 9:03:37 PM
Post# of 149263
So with NP, I think the science is better off than if any person was CEO previously.
Now could NP have done better job with financing. Yes, absolutely. A top level ceo would have done better I believe. Also, some bad decisions on other items as I have listed, another is running a razor thin edge on financing, which caught up to them a month ago and hurt the share price.
Also, the mismanaging expectations has really hurt the share price. I give you all of those, yes.
But I will give credit where credit is due with the science. So I take the good with the bad.
Remember the BOD gave him a big raise last year, so there is a big disconnect between the BOD and some shareholders here.
Now could NP have done better job with financing. Yes, absolutely. A top level ceo would have done better I believe. Also, some bad decisions on other items as I have listed, another is running a razor thin edge on financing, which caught up to them a month ago and hurt the share price.
Also, the mismanaging expectations has really hurt the share price. I give you all of those, yes.
But I will give credit where credit is due with the science. So I take the good with the bad.
Remember the BOD gave him a big raise last year, so there is a big disconnect between the BOD and some shareholders here.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
