debated about responding
what i find so interesting about *some* is the focus on other folks' money
and even worse imo .. is trying to *normalize* the abnormal
everyone enters an OTC stock for different reasons .. but odds are most retail
investors enter because they expect to make money not lose it .. but then again
that is retail .. retail in no way can *compete* with Non Retail .. and it's why sometimes one has to lose money to learn what is done by NR and how it's done
what becomes crystal clear are those *aliases* who don't hold one share
of any company they post on (LR posts on both PTOI and IPIX and has for years)
it has never passed the smell test .. imo
then you have the chronic whiners who post nothing but *whines* .. some
seemingly with little to no business experience .. just relentless whines that fill up a SMB every time they post
if some won't even take the time to observe *trades* to see that say for the last week or so MM PAUL has been blocking on almost every *ask* hit .. usually in conjunction with CDEL .. sometimes this week with NITE .. with a 5000 sized elastic ask .. but then whines about the PPS (and the usual NR *posted* response is *the market wasn't impressed* as *if* that statement has anything to do with a MM BLOCKING for 100s of 1000s of *volume* trades)
what was so interesting the other day was to see the news and IPIX being allowed to close up
i do not kid when i note (and 10 years of documentation allows me to state this)
an upside down NR .. tries to make good news look bad (volume and closing down) and bad news look fatal (above avg volume and a significant close down)
this board (and site) was set up as a direct contrast to the vehicle of choice .. whose founder sat in a federal pen for years due to *activities* there .. vehicle of choice has always been the playground for NR and illegal OTC stock manipulation
retail can almost never outlast NR .. neither can most OTC targets
the ones that do are epic in how handled ..
Innovation's mgmt is clearly aware of NRs' efforts .. and has been since their aggressive response of 2015
we are now in the 4th year of an UPSIDE DOWN NR re: IPIX (fka CTIX)
and there is no one .. even the dimmest bulb of investors with the analytics capacity of a paint chip .. who can't note Innovation's measurable progress over the years
which is why *most* can see the cycles of money in play by NR (pps runs up to reset back down) in 2013/2014 (pps wise)
the issue re: an OTC survivor is when mgmt's news (company's ability to execute) retains investors far more so than those trading crews and NR
since investors retain their *shares* .. that then becomes NRs' biggest dilemma
and it's why DRS %s matter .. yet this data is almost *exclusively scorned* by NR and *trading crews* embedded for those noted *cycles of money* (runs to reset)
the money involved is massive .. and to reiterate most OTC targets do not outlast or survive *imo* .. NRs' unrelenting *efforts*
that is why this board had to be disrupted and infested .. sometime's it is easier to just ignore NRs' efforts than engage them imo
but i also understand the frustration
TGIF ..
4kids
Must be nice to have that kind of money to throw at an OTC play. He said he was averaged around .70. That's actually about where I am now too lol. I'm not answering his questions anymore, but I did restore his post. Hound deleted it as off topic, I don't think it was.
This part...
The most surprising thing is all the positive posters who are left never show any emotion for losing money.
Not many admit losing on a public site. Just the way it is. Some just bail and trail off with their tails between their legs and vanish.
Then, some just stay on and think they're getting revenge by bashing like morons.
I took emotion out of play with the market years ago. Somehow I still manage to let the media mess me up, last month I bailed on my etf's thinking we were about to break support with all the BS they were posting only to be left in the dust. Now, with futures up almost 200 points I don't want to chase.
Anyway, just rambling.
what i find so interesting about *some* is the focus on other folks' money
and even worse imo .. is trying to *normalize* the abnormal
everyone enters an OTC stock for different reasons .. but odds are most retail
investors enter because they expect to make money not lose it .. but then again
that is retail .. retail in no way can *compete* with Non Retail .. and it's why sometimes one has to lose money to learn what is done by NR and how it's done
what becomes crystal clear are those *aliases* who don't hold one share
of any company they post on (LR posts on both PTOI and IPIX and has for years)
it has never passed the smell test .. imo
then you have the chronic whiners who post nothing but *whines* .. some
seemingly with little to no business experience .. just relentless whines that fill up a SMB every time they post
if some won't even take the time to observe *trades* to see that say for the last week or so MM PAUL has been blocking on almost every *ask* hit .. usually in conjunction with CDEL .. sometimes this week with NITE .. with a 5000 sized elastic ask .. but then whines about the PPS (and the usual NR *posted* response is *the market wasn't impressed* as *if* that statement has anything to do with a MM BLOCKING for 100s of 1000s of *volume* trades)
what was so interesting the other day was to see the news and IPIX being allowed to close up
i do not kid when i note (and 10 years of documentation allows me to state this)
an upside down NR .. tries to make good news look bad (volume and closing down) and bad news look fatal (above avg volume and a significant close down)
this board (and site) was set up as a direct contrast to the vehicle of choice .. whose founder sat in a federal pen for years due to *activities* there .. vehicle of choice has always been the playground for NR and illegal OTC stock manipulation
retail can almost never outlast NR .. neither can most OTC targets
the ones that do are epic in how handled ..
Innovation's mgmt is clearly aware of NRs' efforts .. and has been since their aggressive response of 2015
we are now in the 4th year of an UPSIDE DOWN NR re: IPIX (fka CTIX)
and there is no one .. even the dimmest bulb of investors with the analytics capacity of a paint chip .. who can't note Innovation's measurable progress over the years
which is why *most* can see the cycles of money in play by NR (pps runs up to reset back down) in 2013/2014 (pps wise)
the issue re: an OTC survivor is when mgmt's news (company's ability to execute) retains investors far more so than those trading crews and NR
since investors retain their *shares* .. that then becomes NRs' biggest dilemma
and it's why DRS %s matter .. yet this data is almost *exclusively scorned* by NR and *trading crews* embedded for those noted *cycles of money* (runs to reset)
the money involved is massive .. and to reiterate most OTC targets do not outlast or survive *imo* .. NRs' unrelenting *efforts*
that is why this board had to be disrupted and infested .. sometime's it is easier to just ignore NRs' efforts than engage them imo
but i also understand the frustration
TGIF ..
4kids
Must be nice to have that kind of money to throw at an OTC play. He said he was averaged around .70. That's actually about where I am now too lol. I'm not answering his questions anymore, but I did restore his post. Hound deleted it as off topic, I don't think it was.
This part...
The most surprising thing is all the positive posters who are left never show any emotion for losing money.
Not many admit losing on a public site. Just the way it is. Some just bail and trail off with their tails between their legs and vanish.
Then, some just stay on and think they're getting revenge by bashing like morons.
I took emotion out of play with the market years ago. Somehow I still manage to let the media mess me up, last month I bailed on my etf's thinking we were about to break support with all the BS they were posting only to be left in the dust. Now, with futures up almost 200 points I don't want to chase.
Anyway, just rambling.
14
