So my thinking is that we were dismissed on Alice in the lower courts and that's what we were appealing to the Fed circ and also why the orals surrounded patent eligibility and not comparisons of SA's vs SFOR's implementation of the patent. So to me this didn't seem like it was a decision that SA is not infringing but I could be totally wrong. I don't see how it could be argued that SA isn't using SFOR's patents and they weren't trying to argue that on 2/4. Maybe we could get some clarification from Mark?